Compare

Fish curry (Kerala/coastal, coconut) vs Prawn curry

Gram for calorie, Fish curry (Kerala/coastal, coconut) carries more protein per kcal than Prawn curry — 13.2 g protein for 167 kcal against 12.8 g for 164 kcal. For fat loss, where protein-per-calorie matters most, Fish curry (Kerala/coastal, coconut) is the better lever. For muscle gain, where total protein grams matter more than the calorie cost, Fish curry (Kerala/coastal, coconut) wins with 13.2 g against 12.8 g. On cost, Fish curry (Kerala/coastal, coconut) is the cheaper way to hit a protein target — ₹68.2 per 20 g protein versus ₹140.6. Neither is "bad" — Fish curry (Kerala/coastal, coconut) is a fish & seafood item and Prawn curry is a fish & seafood item, so the honest answer is usually "both, on different days," not a single winner.

167Fish curry kcal
  • 164Prawn curry kcal
  • 13.2gFish curry protein
  • 12.8gPrawn curry protein

Side by side

MetricFish curry (Kerala/coastal, coconut)Prawn curry
Serving1 katori1 katori
Calories167164
Protein g13.212.8
Carbs g5.74.7
Fat g10.110.4
Cost per serving4590
Best for muscle gain
Best for fat loss
Best for budget

Questions people ask

Which has more protein, Fish curry (Kerala/coastal, coconut) or Prawn curry?
Fish curry (Kerala/coastal, coconut) has 13.2 g protein per serving; Prawn curry has 12.8 g. Fish curry (Kerala/coastal, coconut) is ahead in absolute grams.
Which is better for fat loss?
Fish curry (Kerala/coastal, coconut) carries more protein per calorie, which tends to help with satiety on a calorie deficit — but total daily calories still decide the outcome.
Which is cheaper per gram of protein?
Fish curry (Kerala/coastal, coconut) is the cheaper source of protein between the two, at current Indian retail prices.