Compare

Naan (plain, tandoor) vs Roti / phulka (whole wheat, no ghee)

Gram for calorie, Naan (plain, tandoor) carries less protein per kcal than Roti / phulka (whole wheat, no ghee) — 6.9 g protein for 244 kcal against 3.2 g for 95 kcal. For fat loss, where protein-per-calorie matters most, Roti / phulka (whole wheat, no ghee) is the better lever. For muscle gain, where total protein grams matter more than the calorie cost, Naan (plain, tandoor) wins with 6.9 g against 3.2 g. On cost, Roti / phulka (whole wheat, no ghee) is the cheaper way to hit a protein target — ₹12.5 per 20 g protein versus ₹115.9. Neither is "bad" — Naan (plain, tandoor) is a restaurant plate item and Roti / phulka (whole wheat, no ghee) is a grain & staple item, so the honest answer is usually "both, on different days," not a single winner.

244Naan kcal
  • 95Roti kcal
  • 6.9gNaan protein
  • 3.2gRoti protein

Side by side

MetricNaan (plain, tandoor)Roti / phulka (whole wheat, no ghee)
Serving1 naan (90 g)1 medium roti (6 inch), 30 g atta
Calories24495
Protein g6.93.2
Carbs g45.319.3
Fat g3.90.5
Cost per serving402
Best for muscle gain
Best for fat loss
Best for budget

Questions people ask

Which has more protein, Naan (plain, tandoor) or Roti / phulka (whole wheat, no ghee)?
Naan (plain, tandoor) has 6.9 g protein per serving; Roti / phulka (whole wheat, no ghee) has 3.2 g. Naan (plain, tandoor) is ahead in absolute grams.
Which is better for fat loss?
Roti / phulka (whole wheat, no ghee) carries more protein per calorie, which tends to help with satiety on a calorie deficit — but total daily calories still decide the outcome.
Which is cheaper per gram of protein?
Roti / phulka (whole wheat, no ghee) is the cheaper source of protein between the two, at current Indian retail prices.